Application hosting from every node
The interface, its domain, TLS, assets, updates, and backend logic can share the network that executes the application.
Architecture comparison
Speed alone does not make a complete platform. Compare the architectural trade-offs across scale, security, access, storage, runtime flexibility, and application delivery.
Open the comparisonWe score architectural capabilities using our comparison methodology and feature set. These scores represent our architectural assessment, not independent performance benchmarks.
WHERE ITZA IS DIFFERENT
ITZA treats the wider application stack as part of the architecture, reducing dependency on external infrastructure and fragile integration seams.
The interface, its domain, TLS, assets, updates, and backend logic can share the network that executes the application.
Contracts get isolated deterministic SQL, including indexed queries and free read paths through simulation.
A cluster can target compact hardware or high-performance servers without changing the protocol model.
Identity, KYC, reviews, permissions, escrow, juries, governance, and atomic exchange are protocol capabilities.
Rent, multiple storage classes, pruning, archival replication, and funded permanence keep long-term state accountable.
Organizations can control validator admission and data access while retaining the same application surface.
NATIVE SURFACE
This table compares native protocol support. External services and application-level contracts can extend every platform, but they add separate systems and trust boundaries.
| Capability | ITZA | Ethereum | Solana | Bitcoin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Node-served web applications | ||||
| Private contract SQL | ||||
| Custom domains and delegated TLS | ||||
| Native identity and reputation | ||||
| Public, private, and hybrid clusters | ||||
| WASM and EVM in one platform | ||||
| Rent-backed multi-tier storage |